The security climate has led to most countries increasing spend lately, with Italy being a notable exception. Lots of countries spend around £10bn a year - a quarter of our spend - as do Israel, though in their case that's over 5% of gdp. Which is tiny compared with Saudi Arabia's remarkable 14%. Of course, it's expensive maintaining order in an autocratic country and playing both sides by helping anti-insurgency efforts in some countries while waging proxy puppeteering wars in others, as noted by Boris Johnson.
Here's the top 20 for you to browse for yourself:
Rank
|
Country
|
Spend (£bn)
|
Notes
|
1
|
USA
|
489.2
|
>3% of gdp
|
2
|
China
|
150.8
|
+43% in 5yrs, £196bn by 2020
|
3
|
UK
|
42.3
|
2% of gdp
|
4
|
India
|
39.8
|
Into the top 5 for the first time
|
5
|
Saudi Arabia
|
38.2
|
13.9% of gdp
|
6
|
Russia
|
38
|
Cut 5% in last year after increases every year since 1998
|
7
|
France
|
34.8
|
Increasing in 2017
|
8
|
Japan
|
32.7
|
Increased in 2016
|
9
|
Germany
|
28
|
Planning first army expansion since cold war
|
10
|
South Korea
|
26.3
|
Further increases planned to 2020
|
11
|
Australia
|
21
|
1.9% of gdp
|
12
|
Italy
|
18.1
|
1.3% of gdp. Cut recently
|
13
|
Brazil
|
18
|
1.5% gdp. Much on border drug control
|
14
|
UAE
|
14.9
|
Contributing to anti-Islamist operations
|
15
|
Canada
|
11
|
<1% of gdp
|
16
|
Israel
|
10.9
|
5.4% of gdp (peaked at 24% in
1980s)
|
17
|
Taiwan
|
10.8
|
Pressure from USA to spend more
|
18
|
Turkey
|
10
|
Recently increased spend by 20%
|
19
|
Spain
|
9.3
|
Increased in 2015 after 6 years of cuts
|
20
|
Algeria
|
8.3
|
Defence spend doubled 2004-2014 following civil war
|
I saw the analysis on MSN's newsfeed but of course it comes from the well known publication Jane's. The spoon fed version is at
Trouble is we waste Billions on Trident while we can't afford to look after our elderly or run the NHS half decently. Bloody odd priorities to me Phil.
ReplyDeleteWell, DM, a degree of agreement! We certainly waste billions and we don't run the NHS half decently (which is part of the millions wasted). We might well have a long debate on what was and was not waste... but 2% of gdp on defence (whether or not on Trident) strikes me as not unreasonable so that wouldn't free up anything for the worthy needs you identify. I suspect your Trident is my international aid, which I wouldn't cut to zero but there seem to be many ridiculous examples of what it's spent on. I'd be inclined to budget for zero spend but hold a significant contingency for spend as and when needed on obviously acute humanitarian disasters wherever they occur rather than funding "projects" that pass some tests which often seem to be dodgy in hindsight. But that's a whole different debate...
ReplyDelete